A duplicate file isn't a file problem. That's a clinical problem.
A two-broken history means that whoever requests the following study does not see the previous, allergies or previous patient reference value. It's a clinical risk, not just a capture problem.
The identity remains a patient's clearance procedure and becomes a security check. NOM-024 already points there as they demand CURP Validated as an identifier for information exchange in health.
The NOM-024 It requires a validated identifier for interinstitutional health information exchange. The quality of this master identity prevents duplication and miscrossing of results.
Three products, not a consultant.
JAAK offers electronic information and signature software. Test each person directly and we are not an office and this does not replace his or her legal team's advice.
Fingerproof face biometrics, OCR official identification and list consultation, in a single flow.
- Liveness detection (anti-supurization)
- OCR official identification
- Consultation with list and risk
- Expediente digital descargable
The moment we decide everything else.
To solve his or her identity before creating his or her registry costs seconds. To solve them after that, while there are already two histories with distributed results, it costs a fusion process and an already run clinical risk.
María G. Hernández
- High at reception, manual capture
- Two 2024 studies
- Registered allergies
Ma. Guadalupe Hernandez
- Indoor high with no validation
- Four studies from 2025 and 2026
- No registered allergies
A single record
- Documentary and biometric monitoring before creating registration
- Six studies on a continuous timeline
- Visible allergies for those applying for the following study
- Without repeated study for not finding the previous
What's the rule about every requirement.
Without intermediate interpretations: instrument, number and what requires in practice. The links to the Official Journal are at the end of the page.
NOM-024-SSA3-2012
Obliga6.4 · 6.5
Use of national and CURP Validated as an identifier for information exchange in health. The quality of the master identity is what prevents duplication and miscrosses.
NOM-024-SSA3-2012
Obliga5.3 · 5.6 · 5.8 · 5.9
Confidentiality, integrity, preservation, traceability, completeness and inalterability. The system should record events and avoid silent changes.
NOM-024-SSA3-2012
Obliga6.6.1 · 6.6.3
Security management system with no repudiation and authentication at least by user and password. Generic or shared accounts erode attribution.
NOM-004-SSA3-2012
Obliga5.10
Any note should have date, time and full name with autograph, electronic or digital signature. It applies to the order and result report that are integrated into the file.
LFPDPPP 2025
Obliga2 fr. VI · 8 · 18
Health and genetic data are sensitive and require explicit and written consent and safety measures commensurate with risk and sensitivities.
NOM-151-SCFI-2016
Permite5.3.2 · Appendix A
Fully and unaltered controlled digitalization and constancy that allows to verify existence and integrity from a date. Useful for results and to migrate paper collection.
Statements that circulate and do not resist the number.
We hear them from vendor evaluations and internal committees in this sector.
"The duplicates are a database cleaning problem."
They are a clinical problem. A two-broken history means that whoever requests the following study does not see the previous, allergies or previous patient reference value.
NOM-024 • 6.4 and 6.5
"The result is signed in PDF, with that being credited."
A PDF that looks right doesn't by itself prove that it was not altered after its issue. The integrity requires cryptographic print, seal and log; the visible file is something else.
NOM-024 · 5.8 and 5.9 · CCom 93 Bis
"with user and password we fulfill authentication."
That is the minimum the regulation requires, and the regulation itself recommends additional factors. With shared accounts across shifts, non-repudiation no longer holds even if the system logs everything.
NOM-024 · 6.6.1 and 6.6.3
Two ways to continue, as necessary.
30 minutes with a product specialist from JAAK
We review his patient's clearance and show him how to configure KYC To solve identity at reception and reduce duplication. We do not give legal advice: certification audit criteria have to be defined by your own quality equipment.
To schedule the sittingRetirement at reception
Document and biometric verification that resolves identity before creating the record, plus proof of integrity over the issued result. Ninety-second demos and API documentation.
Information material. It does not replace a legal opinion for a particular case. No technology itself guarantees legal validity, prevents sanctions or excludes professional liability. What can do a well-designed system is to reduce gaps of evidence and explain what happened.
Each statement of this page has its official source.
Consulted on July 27, 2026. If you find an up-to-date, write and correct with a date of visible review.